ACCC Sues Microsoft Over Alleged Misleading Subscription Practices
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has filed a Federal Court case against Microsoft Australia and its parent company, Microsoft Corporation.
They are accused of misleading approximately 2.7 million Australian customers regarding subscription options and pricing.
Azernews reports, citing foreign media.
The news outlet invites readers to support open, independent, quality journalism by subscribing to their online newspaper.
Subscription options include full digital access to all news for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year.
- Full digital access to all news for 1 month
- Full digital access to all news for 3 months
- Full digital access to all news for 6 months
- Full digital access to all news for 1 year
Readers can also follow AzerNEWS on Twitter @AzerNewsAz or Facebook @AzerNewsNewspaper.
Author's summary: ACCC sues Microsoft for misleading customers.
More News
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- Breeze’s David Neeleman: Why Startup Airlines Can’t Compete With the Big Four
- The journey continues: Courtois shines at San Mamés
- Antonio Brown seeks dismissal of attempted murder charge based on “stand your ground” law
- No. 1 Kentucky breezes by Wofford in round 1 of the NCAA Tournament
- BREEZE Instagram Bio Summary
- Macclesfield FC line-up - Emirates FA Cup
- Gill Cleared! Gambhir Says He's Ready to Go
- 10 Slow-Paced Towns In Idaho Where You Can Live Peacefully, Happily, And Debt-Free