Michigan Senate Approves Fee Hike for Hunting and Fishing Licenses
Legislation to increase the cost of hunting and fishing licenses in Michigan has been approved by the state Senate.
If signed into law, the increase would generate tens of millions of dollars in additional state revenue.
- The bill would increase fees for almost every kind of permit.
- A new license format would also be introduced.
- The proposed laws, SB 276 and 277, would amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act.
The Michigan DNR would be responsible for increasing the permit fee for various hunting and fishing licenses.
The bill was approved by a 23-13 vote in the Michigan legislature and still needs to clear the state House before getting the governor's signature.
No comment from the authorities is available at this time.
Author's summary: Michigan Senate approves hunting and fishing license fee hike.
More News
- BREEZE Instagram Bio Summary
- How many syllables in breezes?
- The journey continues: Courtois shines at San Mamés
- Breeze adding new nonstop flights from Long Island to Myrtle Beach
- Macclesfield FC live score, schedule & player stats
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- Ground stop at Hartsfield-Jackson ended but delays continue
- Ground verb - meaning and usage
- Suryakumar Yadav becomes Mumbai's top T20 scorer
- ‘It would take 11 seconds to hit the ground’: the roughneck daredevils who built the Empire State Building