Missing pockets in women's clothes are a widely discussed topic among women. The absence of pockets in women's trousers and dresses is not a matter of aesthetics, but rather a reflection of social control over women, limiting their freedom and autonomy.
According to the discussion, the lack of pockets is a result of patriarchal machismo, which has dictated the law in terms of fashion. Having a pocket means having a personal space, a place to keep belongings without depending on others, a seemingly banal but profoundly political gesture.
Having a pocket means having a personal space, a place in which to keep what belongs to us without depending on others — a seemingly banal, but profoundly political gesture.
Today, the demand for roomy pockets, fueled by the return of cargo pants and feminist campaigns like #wewantpockets, still speaks of the desire for independence and equality.
Author's summary: Patriarchal machismo limits women's freedom through fashion.