Tipperary Champions Clonmel Commercials Run Out of Steam
Ten years after their landmark provincial triumph, Clonmel Commercials’ hopes of progressing in the Munster Club Senior Football Championship ended in disappointment. They were defeated by St Finbarr’s in a tense quarter-final at Clonmel Sportsfield.
Final Score: St Finbarr’s 1-17, Clonmel Commercials 2-11.
The Tipperary champions played with energy and determination before a crowd of nearly 2,000, despite challenging weather following heavy rain. For much of the game, they appeared stronger but failed to convert sustained pressure into decisive scores.
St Finbarr’s made the most of their chances, holding their nerve in the closing minutes to secure a home semi-final against the Clare champions, Éire Óg of Ennis.
“The game slipped away from them as they lost out in a gripping encounter against St Finbarr's.”
At halftime, Commercials led narrowly by 1-9 to 1-8 and created several scoring opportunities early in the second half. However, a number of attempts missed their mark or were comfortably saved by Cork goalkeeper Darragh Newman. Despite dominating possession, their finishing struggled to match their effort, allowing St Finbarr’s to edge ahead late on.
Author’s Summary
Clonmel Commercials fought bravely but their missed chances and fading energy in the final minutes cost them victory against St Finbarr’s in this hard-fought Munster quarter-final.
More News
- Suryakumar Yadav rewards young sensation Ayush Mhatre with bat after his explosive 110-run innings against Vidarbha
- ‘It would take 11 seconds to hit the ground’: the roughneck daredevils who built the Empire State Building
- Breeze adding new nonstop flights from Long Island to Myrtle Beach
- Breeze’s David Neeleman: Why Startup Airlines Can’t Compete With the Big Four
- GROUND | traduire en français - Cambridge Dictionary
- Suryakumar Yadav Becomes Mumbai's Highest T20 Run-Scorer
- Skippylongstocking excels in Harlan’s Holiday Stakes
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- Suryakumar Yadav Becomes Mumbai's Top T20 Run-Scorer