Clippers Face Harsh Reality with Chris Paul
After decades of NBA history, the LA Clippers should have realized that the only 40-year-old player consistently performing at a high level is LeBron James. Despite this, the Clippers signed Chris Paul, also 40, expecting to manage his workload throughout the regular season and still see occasional standout performances in the playoffs.
Following the Clippers' fourth game of the 2025-26 regular season, it became clear from Paul's debut in Salt Lake City that these hopes were somewhat unrealistic. The issue wasn't just his modest stats—four points and four assists—but his efficiency, shooting only 1-for-5 from the field.
“Paul's veteran voice and high IQ will be needed, but consistency will be his biggest challenge over the Clippers' next 78 games.”
Roster and Rotation Challenges
When the Clippers had their full roster available, Tyronn Lue had one "Did Not Play" (DNP) spot to assign, which went to Bogdan Bogdanovic. However, with guard Bradley Beal out during games three and four, the team was short on guards, pushing their ten-man rotation, including four veteran guards, to its limit.
Currently, all eleven Clippers players are available, allowing the coaching staff more flexibility. This means a DNP due to "coach’s decision" is now likely the only reason a player might not see game action moving forward.
Author's Summary
The Clippers underestimated the challenges of relying on a 40-year-old Chris Paul for consistent high-level play, and managing their guard rotation remains a key obstacle for the season ahead.
More News
- Suryakumar Yadav Breaks Past Rohit Sharma to Set New Mumbai T20 Batting Record
- Suryakumar Yadav Becomes Mumbai's Highest T20 Run-Scorer
- Column: Toy drive for Mutual Ground stirs memories of Aurora City Council member’s own traumatic childhood
- Sunny Days Ahead as Tampa Enjoys Mild Temperatures
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- This Tranquil Florida State Park
- ‘It would take 11 seconds to hit the ground’: the roughneck daredevils who built the Empire State Building
- Breeze adding new nonstop flights from Long Island to Myrtle Beach
- Breeze Bets Big On Raleigh With New Summer Routes
- FGR manager Robbie Savage focus of new BBC documentary