Attorneys Request Reconsideration of David Taylor's Detention
Defense lawyers for David Taylor, the former leader of Kingdom of God Global Church, have asked a judge to rethink the detention order that keeps him in custody before his trial.
Background of Charges
Taylor faces federal charges including forced labor and conspiracy to launder money. The court previously denied his bond, citing concerns about his contact with church members during ongoing proceedings.
Allegations Against Taylor and Church Executive
Alongside Michelle Brannon, the church’s executive director, Taylor is accused of compelling church members across Michigan, Florida, Texas, and Missouri to work without pay in call centers soliciting donations.
Evidence Presented by Prosecutors
Prosecutors uncovered numerous text messages suggesting Taylor ordered punishments for those failing to meet donation targets. The alleged penalties included:
- Food deprivation
- Sleep deprivation
- Shelter deprivation
- Denial of medical care
Defense Arguments in Motion to Appeal Detention
Taylor's attorneys argue these texts occurred during a church "theological orientation," also called a "boot camp," described as challenging but voluntary and not harmful.
"The orientation was rigorous, but not harmful, and was voluntarily attended by every participant."
They further claim Taylor did not personally carry out or witness these punishments and was living in seclusion in North Carolina when the messages were sent.
Author’s summary: David Taylor’s attorneys seek release by framing contested church practices as voluntary religious training, disputing allegations of abuse linked to forced labor charges.
More News
- IPL Auction 2025
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- Breeze adding new nonstop flights from Long Island to Myrtle Beach
- Republicans lose ground in Tennessee special election
- This Tranquil Florida State Park
- Suryakumar Yadav Breaks Past Rohit Sharma to Set New Mumbai T20 Batting Record
- Suryakumar Yadav rewards young sensation Ayush Mhatre with bat after his explosive 110-run innings against Vidarbha
- Sunny Days Ahead as Tampa Enjoys Mild Temperatures
- Macclesfield FC line-up - Emirates FA Cup