Electric Mason brings up 462-
Following the VOA news, the head of the US Agency for International Development, Samantha Power, said at a news conference that the US had provided $462 million in assistance to Ukraine since the start of the conflict with Russia.
"We have committed $462 million in assistance and that is in addition to the $15 billion in security assistance that we have provided to Ukraine so far," Power said.
She added that the US had also provided military aid to Ukraine, including weapons and training for the Ukrainian military.
- Power said the US had provided $15 billion in security assistance to Ukraine since the start of the conflict.
- The US had also provided military aid to Ukraine, including weapons and training for the Ukrainian military.
She said the US would continue to provide support to Ukraine as long as Russia continues its aggression against Ukraine.
Power said the US was committed to helping Ukraine defend itself against Russian aggression and to supporting the Ukrainian people.
She said the US would continue to work with other countries to provide support to Ukraine and to isolate Russia diplomatically and economically.
Author's summary:
In this article, the head of the US Agency for International Development, Samantha Power, announces that the US has provided $462 million in assistance to Ukraine since the start of the conflict with Russia, in addition to the $15 billion in security assistance provided so far. The US will continue to support Ukraine as long as Russia continues its aggression against the country.More News
- Teleperformance Shares Advance 3.39% at Opening
- BREEZE Instagram Bio Summary
- Antonio Brown seeks dismissal of attempted murder charge based on “stand your ground” law
- and <CONTENT>. We should not add the translate tags unless explicitly needed by user input. The content is in English with some Russian instructions. We should keep content compliant with copyright: we cannot reproduce copyrighted text beyond 90 characters unless it’s in the public domain or we have rights. The Cambridge dictionary entry is copyrighted. Providing the exact quoted content beyond 90 characters would violate policy. The user provided original content: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is a short excerpt of the dictionary definition. We must consider copyright: It's a short excerpt; policy allows non-user-provided copyrighted text up to 90 characters unless in a location-based request. They provided the content; we can transform or summarize it. They want quotes preserved. We can quote the provided sentence but it's 119 characters? Let's count: "to walk into a place quickly and confidently, without worry or embarrassment. She just breezed in as if she'd only been away a day instead of a year." This is longer than 90 characters. They provided two sentences. We should avoid reproducing long copyrighted text beyond 90 characters. We can provide a summary instead and minimal quotes from the user-provided content? They require preserving quotes without distortion. But policy allows non-user provided content? The user supplied content; quoting long phrases from user-provided text is allowed since user provided the content; the restriction is only for copyrighted text not provided by user. So since the user supplied content, we can include it. But we are supposed to transform and normalize. Also the user wants to output in specific tags: <TITLE> with original title length at least 20 chars. They asked: <TITLE>[тут оригинальный заголовок от 20 символов]
- Macclesfield see off Slough in extra-time
- Breeze’s David Neeleman: Why Startup Airlines Can’t Compete With the Big Four
- FGR manager Robbie Savage focus of new BBC documentary
- Macclesfield FC live score, schedule & player stats
- Sunny Days Ahead as Tampa Enjoys Mild Temperatures
- Column: Toy drive for Mutual Ground stirs memories of Aurora City Council member’s own traumatic childhood