The Dismissal Deniers
Next Tuesday marks the 50th anniversary of the day when Governor-General Sir John Kerr lawfully used a constitutional power to end a political deadlock and secure the necessary funds for the Crown to continue governing. Despite his rightful action, Sir John Kerr has been relentlessly criticized, even after his death.
It is important to clarify that Sir John Kerr did not remove a grossly incompetent government—that was the will of the Australian people. Kerr only provided the means for that change. His decision was not motivated by this outcome but it was a consequence of his intervention.
This anniversary was expected to renew attacks against Sir John Kerr, but unexpectedly the criticism has come from three fronts: a new biography of Whitlam, a Sky News Australia documentary, and a day-long event hosted by the Museum of Australian Democracy, broadcast live from Old Parliament House.
Partisan Perspectives on the Anniversary
The live event, chaired by Barrie Cassidy, features participants such as journalists Paul Kelly and Troy Bramston, and academic Professor Jenny Hocking, all strong opponents of Kerr. Most of these contributors are aligned with the Labor Party, setting the stage for a highly charged debate.
"Sir John Kerr did not deliver us from a grossly incompetent government. The people of Australia did that. Sir John Kerr simply gave them the opportunity to do so."
The day will likely be filled with intense arguments surrounding the historic dismissal, reflecting ongoing divisions in how Kerr's actions are interpreted.
Author’s Summary
This anniversary reveals the deep divisions in Australia's political landscape, highlighting how Sir John Kerr's constitutional intervention remains a fiercely debated and polarizing moment in history.